|
Alternatif Dilde Özet:
|
Due to the fast development of Technology in the last 50 years and the convenience that it provides, different societies are able to know and contact easier and more accurate the languages and Literatures. The result of this Knowing is high consideration of languages and literatures of other cultures. Accordingly researchers read with great enthusiasm the literary works of other foreign cultures and beside their own literary works, they evaluate comparatively. During history many studies have been carried on the similarity of languages, cultures and custom of nations which had relationships. In recent years also researches have been done in regard to differences of culture and literatures. Sohrâb Sepehrî is one of the prominent and distinguished poets of modern time of Iran. Because of his usage of different images in his poets, he had a special reputation. His distinct method of rehetoric in poetry has given every element of nature a new and deep image. In Turkish literature, Abdul Haq Hamad Tarhan has used nature in a different and modern way for the first time. He viewed the nature in a new and distinct manner and he became fond of it and by means of nature he found a way to God. Abdulhak Hamid, mainly was the pioneer in the presenting the Western-Oriented challenges in the Turkish Poetry, besides of all criticizes, faced from the Royal Litrature, he couragesly offered new adaptations from the West Poetry to the Turkish Litrature. Like Sohrab,who introduced new vision and innovation to the Persian Poetry, Hamid also, offered these presents to the Turkish Poetry. Both these two poets have been motivated by classic literature and steps further from the classic frames and clichés, simultaneously, by introducing new technics then by their special languages,offered a new vision to the universe and new style in the word statement. So, they counted as the most outstanding personalities in the passing era of the classic to the modern poetry. In this research, by giving examples from the poems of these two poets, we are comparing their view toward nature and their usage of nature in their works. We are also trying to mention the differences and similarities of their sense and thoughts in relation to nature and more over show what they have in common.
|