|
Makale Özeti:
|
The necessity of examination of every case within its peculiar conditions in social
sciences requires different approaches complying with the spirit and nature of social
sciences. Multiple realities require different and various perceptual interpretations. In
modern world and social sciences, interpretation of perception of valued and multivalued
have been started to be understood by the principles of fuzziness and fuzzy
logic. Having the verbally expressible degrees of truthness such as true, very true,
rather true, etc. fuzzy logic provides the opportunity for the interpretation of
especially complex and rather vague set of information by flexibility or equivalence of
the variables’ of fuzzy limitations.
The methods and principles of fuzzy logic can be benefited in examination of the
methodological problems of law, especially in the applications of filling the legal
loopholes arising from the ambiguities and interpretation problems in order to
understand the legal rules in a more comprehensible and applicable way and the
efficiency of legal implications. On the other hand, fuzzy logic can be used as a
technical legal method in legal education and especially in legal case studies and legal
practice applications in order to provide the perception of law as a value and the
more comprehensive and more quality perception and interpretation of value of
justice, which is the core value of law.
In the perception of what happened as it has happened in legal relationships and
formations, the understanding of social reality and sociological legal rules with multi
valued sense perspective and the their applications in accordance with the fuzzy
logic’s methods could create more equivalent and just results. It can be useful for the
young lawyers and law students as a facilitating legal method especially in the
materialization of the perception and interpretation of multi valued and variables.
Using methods and principles of fuzzy logic in legal education, more quality and just
legal interpretations can be achieved by synchronously dealing with noncontradicting
different perspectives of legal realities.
|